Monthly Archives: August 2016
Let me add to this that positive art does not need rules? I believe that if the emotion or image or idea evoked is positive then the artwork (from my experience) is needed and useful. Negative art, the type that defiles humans their actions and conversations is very adolescent, that is it may be highly […]
Is the simple answer posterity?
If your motivations in making art are strictly monetary, you might make boring art. If your art is only for decoration in the most superficial sense then you might make boring art. On the other hand when you must make art because it is an addiction that must be fed, with the stimulation of playing […]
Unfortunately at this moment in time, I believe this to be true. Most buyers of art just want art on their walls for decoration. Meaning they don’t really care, who the artist is and why the artist does the work of art. Art from my experience is only purchased by the rich and/or educated buyer. Digital […]
Viable form of expression. Is the act of putting pigment on a wall only an ancient ritual to record an activity? Tatoos are a form of body decoration, but is the ornamentation of the body merely a form of decoration unworthy of being called art? I don’t believe painting is dead; although it’s immediate form […]
According to my definition of art and many galleries, digital art is a legitimate form of art. Galleries find that patrons don’t see the art as original. This is where provenance is important. Provenance is a document that proves that the piece is original and a limited edition of less than 250 copies or less.